Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal cohort study (2024)

Kennedy, N. J., Peek, M. J., Quinton, A. E., Lanzarone, V., Martin, A., Benzie, R., & Nanan, R. (2016). Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 123(2), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13758

Kennedy, N. J. ; Peek, M. J. ; Quinton, A. E. et al. / Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome : A longitudinal cohort study. In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016 ; Vol. 123, No. 2. pp. 225-232.

@article{d5b02a6c1b734f778052c7c6a81a31ff,

title = "Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal cohort study",

abstract = "Objective To assess maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) measured by ultrasound as an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Design A prospective longitudinal cohort study performed on pregnancies delivered between 2012 and 2014. Setting Sydney, Australia. Population About 1510 pregnant women attending routine obstetric ultrasounds. Methods Maternal SFT was measured on routine ultrasounds at 11-14 weeks' gestation (SFT1) and 18-22 weeks' gestation (SFT2). SFT measurements were assessed for estimating risks for obesity-related pregnancy outcomes using logistic regression modelling adjusted for maternal age, parity, smoking status and body mass index (BMI). Main outcome measures Hypertensive disease, gestational diabetes, caesarean section, low birthweight, preterm delivery, neonatal respiratory distress, Apgar scores, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Results SFT1 and SFT2 were measured on 1461 and 1363 women, respectively. Mean thickness (range) were 21.2 mm (6.9-73.9) for SFT1 and 20.3 mm (7.5-68.0) for SFT2. Complete outcome data were available for 1385 pregnancies. In all, 54% of the women were overweight/obese. The SFT measures decreased from early to mid-pregnancy in overweight/obese women. There was moderate correlation between BMI and SFT1 (R2 = 0.56) and BMI and SFT2 (R2 = 0.55). In a multivariate model, SFT1 and SFT2 were better predictors for adverse pregnancy outcomes than BMI. Conclusion Maternal SFT is a significant independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Incorporation of SFT into future models for adverse pregnancy outcome may prove valuable.",

keywords = "Adipose, adverse pregnancy outcomes, maternal adipose, obesity, pregnancy, subcutaneous fat, ultrasound",

author = "Kennedy, {N. J.} and Peek, {M. J.} and Quinton, {A. E.} and V. Lanzarone and A. Martin and R. Benzie and R. Nanan",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.13758",

language = "English",

volume = "123",

pages = "225--232",

journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",

issn = "1470-0328",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "2",

}

Kennedy, NJ, Peek, MJ, Quinton, AE, Lanzarone, V, Martin, A, Benzie, R & Nanan, R 2016, 'Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal cohort study', BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13758

Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal cohort study. / Kennedy, N. J.; Peek, M. J.; Quinton, A. E. et al.
In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 123, No. 2, 01.01.2016, p. 225-232.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome

T2 - A longitudinal cohort study

AU - Kennedy, N. J.

AU - Peek, M. J.

AU - Quinton, A. E.

AU - Lanzarone, V.

AU - Martin, A.

AU - Benzie, R.

AU - Nanan, R.

N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective To assess maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) measured by ultrasound as an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Design A prospective longitudinal cohort study performed on pregnancies delivered between 2012 and 2014. Setting Sydney, Australia. Population About 1510 pregnant women attending routine obstetric ultrasounds. Methods Maternal SFT was measured on routine ultrasounds at 11-14 weeks' gestation (SFT1) and 18-22 weeks' gestation (SFT2). SFT measurements were assessed for estimating risks for obesity-related pregnancy outcomes using logistic regression modelling adjusted for maternal age, parity, smoking status and body mass index (BMI). Main outcome measures Hypertensive disease, gestational diabetes, caesarean section, low birthweight, preterm delivery, neonatal respiratory distress, Apgar scores, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Results SFT1 and SFT2 were measured on 1461 and 1363 women, respectively. Mean thickness (range) were 21.2 mm (6.9-73.9) for SFT1 and 20.3 mm (7.5-68.0) for SFT2. Complete outcome data were available for 1385 pregnancies. In all, 54% of the women were overweight/obese. The SFT measures decreased from early to mid-pregnancy in overweight/obese women. There was moderate correlation between BMI and SFT1 (R2 = 0.56) and BMI and SFT2 (R2 = 0.55). In a multivariate model, SFT1 and SFT2 were better predictors for adverse pregnancy outcomes than BMI. Conclusion Maternal SFT is a significant independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Incorporation of SFT into future models for adverse pregnancy outcome may prove valuable.

AB - Objective To assess maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) measured by ultrasound as an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Design A prospective longitudinal cohort study performed on pregnancies delivered between 2012 and 2014. Setting Sydney, Australia. Population About 1510 pregnant women attending routine obstetric ultrasounds. Methods Maternal SFT was measured on routine ultrasounds at 11-14 weeks' gestation (SFT1) and 18-22 weeks' gestation (SFT2). SFT measurements were assessed for estimating risks for obesity-related pregnancy outcomes using logistic regression modelling adjusted for maternal age, parity, smoking status and body mass index (BMI). Main outcome measures Hypertensive disease, gestational diabetes, caesarean section, low birthweight, preterm delivery, neonatal respiratory distress, Apgar scores, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Results SFT1 and SFT2 were measured on 1461 and 1363 women, respectively. Mean thickness (range) were 21.2 mm (6.9-73.9) for SFT1 and 20.3 mm (7.5-68.0) for SFT2. Complete outcome data were available for 1385 pregnancies. In all, 54% of the women were overweight/obese. The SFT measures decreased from early to mid-pregnancy in overweight/obese women. There was moderate correlation between BMI and SFT1 (R2 = 0.56) and BMI and SFT2 (R2 = 0.55). In a multivariate model, SFT1 and SFT2 were better predictors for adverse pregnancy outcomes than BMI. Conclusion Maternal SFT is a significant independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Incorporation of SFT into future models for adverse pregnancy outcome may prove valuable.

KW - Adipose

KW - adverse pregnancy outcomes

KW - maternal adipose

KW - obesity

KW - pregnancy

KW - subcutaneous fat

KW - ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952802398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.13758

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.13758

M3 - Article

SN - 1470-0328

VL - 123

SP - 225

EP - 232

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

IS - 2

ER -

Kennedy NJ, Peek MJ, Quinton AE, Lanzarone V, Martin A, Benzie R et al. Maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness as a predictor for adverse pregnancy outcome: A longitudinal cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016 Jan 1;123(2):225-232. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13758